T he
A ttentional &
 I nterpersonal
S tyle Inventory

Performance Report for:

Sebastian Caballero
Guest Service
Joey Restaurants

9/19/2024

Comparison Group:
TAIS Standard Norm
 

 
 
 


Copyright © 1974–2026 by Grandlark Investments, Inc.
Used under exclusive license to TAIS Performance Systems, Inc.
699 Cardero Street, Suite 502, Vancouver, BC V6G 3H7 Canada
All rights reserved.

 

Table of Contents:
1. Introduction
2. TAIS Scale Profile
3. Attentional Styles
4. Preference for Diverse Activities
5. Orientation towards Rules & Risk
6. Drive and Confidence
7. Ways of Dominating and Competing
8. Decision Making Style
9. Orientation towards Others
10. Communication Style
11. Conclusions & Recommendations
12. Recommended Printing Options
13. How to Save This Document
 

 
Introduction

Welcome to your TAIS Performance Report.

The Attentional & Interpersonal Style Inventory (TAIS) measures constructs crucial to effective performance, especially performance in high pressure situations. It has been used as an aid for training and selection in business, sport and the military. Organizations like Citibank, General Motors, Harley Davidson, the Navy SEALS, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, the Boston Celtics, and U.S., Canadian, Italian and Australian Olympic teams have all benefited from TAIS.

The usefulness of this report will depend upon how honestly and accurately you have evaluated yourself. With valid results, you will be in a better position to identify performance environments, jobs, and missions that will play to your strengths. Your TAIS results will emphasize how you are likely to react under stressful conditions and will illustrate how pressure affects your ability to concentrate, stay motivated, and communicate effectively. This is precisely the information you need to develop the ultimate performance-enhancement program.

While this report should, in general, validate what you already know about yourself, TAIS information provides a unique opportunity to learn more.

We wish you enhanced performance!
 

How To Read Your Results

This Performance Report details your scores on each of the TAIS scales.  The scales measuring Concentration skills appear first, followed by the Interpersonal Characteristics scales.

Each section in this report brings together analyses of your tendencies in related areas.  Each section follows the same format, presenting a summary of your performance before offering detailed explanation and ACTION POINTS which may help guide your development.

The graphic representation looks like this:

TAIS Scores are presented as percentiles ranging from 0.1 to 99.9.  The percentile compares your score to a standard norm group.  The average score on each scale for the standard norms is 50.  Your score is represented as the heavy black line.

Your scores are also compared with a more specific comparison group.  The comparison group scores are represented by the gray shaded area on the graphic.

In this report, the gray shaded area encompasses 67% of the scores for the TAIS Standard Norm group.  Therefore if your percentile score falls outside the gray shaded area, you can conclude that you scored significantly different from "typical" TAIS Standard Norm.
 
 

TAIS Scale Profile

 
 
Attentional Styles 

 
 
ATTENTIONAL SCALES

TAIS inventory is unique in that it incorporates concentration skills along with intra and interpersonal characteristics in its overall assessment of performance. To concentrate effectively, you need to be able to shift both the width and direction of your focus of attention in response to the changing demands of performance situations. The attentional scales on TAIS measure two things: 1) Your ability to develop the different types of concentration required to perform effectively, and; 2) Your ability to shift back and forth between the different channels of concentration at appropriate times.

Because TAIS measures the basic elements of concentration, scores from the inventory can be used to identify the specific skills individuals need to work on to improve their performance.


 

Awareness
This scale measures an individual's sensitivity to what is going on in the environment.

Low scorers:
  • show little awareness of what is going on outside of their immediate task
  • may fail to make adjustments to performance
High scorers:
  • are aware of what is going on, even when focused on another activity
  • are sensitive to subtle interpersonal cues
  • may have a tendency to be too reactive.
 

External Distractibility
This scale measures how easily an individual can be distracted from what they are doing by external factors, such as noise, interruptions and other activities.

Low scorers:
  • are not easily distracted by interruptions, and are able to keep their focus on their main task.
High scorers:
  • find they are fairly easily distracted from their main task by interruptions
  • may be more comfortable in one-on-one interpersonal situations
  • may stay away from busy or chaotic situations.


 
 

Analytical / Conceptual
This scale measures an individual's ability to engage in big-picture analysis, planning, and complex problem-solving.

Low scorers:
  • tend to react to events, rarely planning ahead
  • are uncomfortable when forced to use analytical abilities for sustained periods.
High scorers:
  • consider all aspects of a situation
  • are able to put current events into a bigger context
  • enjoy conceptual and complex problem-solving
  • may make mistakes because they over-analyzed or over-complicate situations.
 

Internal Distractibility
This scale measures an individual's tendency to be distracted by irrelevant thoughts and feelings.

Low scorers:
  • can keep a clear focus on their current task without irrelevant thoughts or feelings intruding.
High scorers:
  • lose their current track of thought quite easily by focusing on irrelevant thoughts or feelings
  • may experience their own thoughts happening so fast they cannot keep up with them.

 
 
 
 

Action / Focused
This scale measures an individual's ability to narrowly focus attention on one thing, to discipline one's self, to follow through, and to avoid being distracted.

Low scorers:
  • may not be able to pay attention to one thing for very long
  • may fail to follow through or adequately attend to details.
High scorers:
  • can pay attention to one thing for sustained periods
  • are dedicated and able to follow through on even boring routines
  • can be counted on to pay close attention to details.
 

Reduced Flexibility
This scale measures how likely an individual is to make mistakes because of narrowing attention too much, thereby either not noticing other relevant factors or focusing exclusively on irrelevant thoughts and feelings.

Low scorers:
  • rarely make mistakes because they fail to shift attention from external to internal and vice versa.
High scorers:
  • make mistakes because they fail to shift attention frequently enough from external to internal or vice versa
  • make decisions without adequate information
  • suffer from "tunnel vision" at certain times.

ATTENTIONAL OVERVIEW

We need your help in explaining your TAIS inventory attentional profile. Your profile is highly impressive and statistically quite rare. In particular, the scores on all three of your attentional styles (SIGNAL) are well above those of their corresponding distraction scores (NOISE -- second member of each attentional pair). Translation: By your answers you are indicating that you are keenly aware of your moment-to-moment surroundings, AND you're able to put ideas together, anticipate consequences, plan, and devise strategies far better than most people AND THEN you can turn around and focus on all the details as you follow through on almost all that you've sensed and planned. Further, you can switch from one of these styles to another in the flick of an eye, and can do this even under high levels of pressure. Almost everyone you meet is less capable than you are in these regards.

Sounds great. So what's the problem? Your scores relate to a person who's like an automobile which is most powerful, and yet gets the best gas mileage. In reality, the dragsters that run the quarter-mile in 5 seconds get horrible gas mileage, while a very fuel-efficient car might have difficulty getting up to speed on highway on-ramps. Most cars aren't completely optimized for one at the utter expense of the other; rather, a trade-off is made so that both qualities are to some degree more or less acceptable. And yet, their relative emphasis is the difference between, say, a Porsche and an Audi, and between an Audi and a Volkswagen. So, the question is, does such a best-of-all-worlds kind of person really describe you?

Consider this: Imagine being in a TV store with 40 sets showing 40 different television programs. You can choose to skim all 40 to take in the variety of images, and judge, say, the varying picture sharpness among them. But as soon as you try to focus on what's showing on them, they "compete" for your attention; turn to a news broadcast on one and you start to lose track of the ballgame on another, etc. The competing "shows" are our internal films, the ones we construct in our head. Often what we can imagine is more interesting than reality. When we go inside our head, we lose track (at least temporarily) of our surroundings.

You get the point. Human beings have definite limitations in the ability to pay attention. Yet we forget our limitations. We try to talk on the phone while we listen to someone in our office. Yet no one can listen to two, brand-new, complex messages at once. So we must make choices -- choices between being aware of our surroundings, going inside our head to think, and following through on details. Human beings are "biased" (e.g., right- vs. left-handed) in practically everything we do. For this reason, TAIS inventory reports are designed around your highEST and lowEST attentional scores. When you are using one style (tuned into one TV show), you cannot be using another style (watching another channel) at just that moment.

In our experience, people score this impressively because of three different reasons. First, a few people are generally well above average and handle pressure extremely well... Superstars. Second, some people are so optimistic or upbeat that they rarely dwell on their problems or mistakes. Third, some people so need to present a good front that they exaggerate strengths and play down weaknesses whenever they can. If you have been successful and possess a strong drive to achieve, you probably are truly quite capable and expect near perfection from yourself. You hate to admit mistakes ] even to yourself. You may be good, even great, but we doubt if anyone is truly as capable as your scores. We might be wrong, but . . .

The major value of taking the TAIS inventory is in getting an accurate reading on your relative strengths and relative limitations. There is evidence that most successful people are realistic in assessing such matters. There is no "weakness" in admitting the inevitable -- nobody can pay attention to everything at once. Because your three attentional scores are all so high and probably close to each other in percentile score, you need to look deeper into which one is your favorite channel and which is your least preferred or used. Ask those people who know you well which attentional style they consider your chief asset. This information is valuable even if you are quite capable of handling most situations adeptly.

 

ATTENTIONAL PROFILE

** RELATIVE STRENGTHS -- CONCEPTUAL/ANALYTICAL FOLLOWED AND SUPPORTED BY AWARENESS.

You have indicated that your greatest attentional strength is your ability to analyze and synthesize input from various sources. This broad-internal focus of attention enables you to conceptualize relationships among events, plan (business projections), develop strategies, and anticipate consequences of action. You adjust quickly to changes in priorities and generating creative approaches to problems. You like to review and mentally rehearse situations in order to learn from them and prepare effective responses.

You often take a conceptual approach to events, thinking and planning even when you are not actively involved. Problem solving exists just for the enjoyment of creating and figuring out something. Thus, when events do not make sense to you, you experience frustration.

Your point of pride is, "I FIGURE THINGS OUT, HAVE LOTS OF IDEAS AND SYNTHESIZE INFORMATION FROM DIVERSE SOURCES."

You have also indicated that you are almost as aware of your surroundings as you are conceptual. Your ability to read people helps you think on your feet. The environment probably stimulates many of your ideas.

There are costs to being highly conceptual, too. Under pressure, you are likely to get caught up in your thoughts and projections and seeking stimulation when you need to be more focused. Your "street sense" is a fine antidote to your ideational side in that it keeps you from "paralysis by analysis." You probably do get lost in thought at times, but apparently not for long. Your decided interest in the big picture, however, does take you away from the details of your action plans.

COMPENSATING THROUGH STRENGTH. When you figure things out, you know where to look and what to concentrate on, even if it is only for a brief time. You are good at making topics significant or interesting. This makes it easier for you to concentrate on them or monitor them. Knowing where to look reduces mistakes.

** RELATIVE WEAKNESS--FOCUSED CONCENTRATION.

You rarely go in a straight line to anything. Your most common lapse in concentration is failing to stay with a topic long enough to take care of the details or complete the work. While you are capable of disciplined concentration, you have indicated that the focused (narrow) style is your least preferred mode of attention. Under pressure, you are more easily seduced by the allure of the new idea than by finishing the existing one. Your big picture approach crowds out the details.

* Learn to slow down enough to complete all your sentences. Don't assume that others will fill in the gaps in your communication the same way you imagine them.

* Be careful that you do not overload agenda. Even if you do not overload yourself, you often confuse others. You listen for the gist of the message, jumping ahead mentally to other matters. Sensitive observers can tell from the glazed look in your eyes when you "tune out."

* Taking notes can keep you focused.

* You will be wise to team with more focused individuals who will keep you on target and realistic about time management. You tend to think you can do almost everything as soon as you can think about it or see it in your mind.

* You need good habits especially in record-keeping matters.

* Team Building. Your ideal pairing is with people who are focused and detail oriented, people more motivated to finish projects than think of new ones. You can supply the ideas and establish priorities or big picture.

** REDUCED FLEXIBILITY OR INABILITY TO SHIFT FOCUS -- LOW

It's difficult -- no impossible -- to pay attention to everything. All human beings get distracted or lose control of their attention at least occasionally.

In your case, it's not so much getting distracted which seems to be your biggest attentional problem as it is your tendency to get stuck on something irrelevant or counterproductive to the exclusion of what is important. When this happens, you lose your ability to switch styles and be flexible in meeting complex demands.

You have indicated that you let this problem ruin your performance far less than the average person does. Still, you are apparently someone who expects near perfection from yourself. Thus, on those rare occasions when you feel like you did not do your best under pressure, it really bothers you. They may have been important times, e.g., in a key negotiation when you pressed too hard.

We all get stuck and lose our flexibility when we get too agitated or emotional. There are two basic reasons for losing our cool--anger and fear or anxiety.

When you get angry at something a colleague or you yourself do, your attention rivets on that thing and you lose perspective at least temporarily. If you are honest, you know you are not at your best when you lose your temper (whether you show it or not). For example, you might let someone's being late cause you to steam internally about such an inconsiderate action. When the person arrives, you are not as capable of dealing with the complex issues that meeting raises.

Fear or anxiety has a way of grabbing hold of us and not letting us go on to other matters. We lose our flexibility when we let fear or worries take hold. When your mind gets stuck on that concern (e.g., about whether you can handle the difficult questions from the board), you fail to concentrate on the things needed for performing well (e.g., the questions being asked). As you review such incidents, you probably can discern that you tried too hard with your basic plan long after it was obvious it was not working.

For more on how to figure out what to do about your most common attentional lapse, check with the professional giving your this feedback or Enhanced Performance Systems about Attention Control Training. The professional will help you decide which of the two forms of stress costs you your flexibility most often and what to do about it. In general, learning to "say hello AND good-bye to distractions" is probably one of the quickest ways to improve your performance. As you learn how to identify quickly when you are frustrated or anxious, center yourself, and redirect your attention to the task at hand, you will find that your ability to recover from mistakes will improve. This pattern will be the heart of the stress-management program you need to perform up to your ability level.

 

Preference for Diverse Activities 

 
 
INFORMATION PROCESSING

Jobs differ in the variety of activities they require and the amount of information which persons in them are expected to handle. People differ along this dimension, too. Some are stressed by having too few things to do, others by having too many. People who score high on this scale are indicating that they are "information junkies," liking to juggle many tasks at once. Those who score low on this scale generally prefer to do one thing at a time and are like people in the crafts, doing something nearly perfectly before moving on. This scale measures your preference for diverse activities and the actual number of different events happening in your life.


 

Information Processing
Low scorers:
  • prefer linear tasking
  • feel stressed by having too many things to do
  • generally prefer to do one thing at a time
  • behave like craftspeople, wanting to complete something perfectly before moving on.
High scorers:
  • prefer multitasking
  • may get bored when there are  too few tasks
  • like to juggle many things at once.

You like the fast track, the hectic life. You have a lot of energy to take on multiple tasks.

On the other hand, you show above average need for closure, to follow through, take care of the details.

These two tendencies are at cross purposes with each other. It is almost impossible to juggle multiple activities and still give each the care it needs. Thus, you are likely to feel stressed because you put yourself into many demanding positions and still demand of yourself the perfectionism of completing each one well.

Long-term you are a candidate for burnout. You can probably handle this for a while, but you do it by being organized AND by working long hours. You can keep this up only so long. Yes, even you.

 

Orientation towards Rules & Risk 

 
ORIENTATION TOWARDS RULES & RISK

Measures the probability of strict adherence to a set pattern of thought or behavior.  High scorers are more likely to act spontaneously, take risks, and think and act in "out of the ordinary" ways.  High scorers who are not easily distracted tend to "live by their own rules."  For this reason, while others may see them as impulsive, they typically view themselves as colorful or risk takers.  They feel stressed when their patterns of thought or behaviors are confined within predefined boundaries.   Low scorers abide by rules and policies, are conventional and thus generally responsible.  They feel stressed when others are not behaving according to rules or expectations.


 
 
Orientation towards Rules and Risk
Low scorers:
  • prefer to stick strictly to rules and policies
  • are conventional and generally responsible
  • tend to feel stressed when asked to break or bend the rules.
High scorers:
  • are more likely to act spontaneously and take risks
  • tend to push limits and resist restrictions
  • are willing to make up or bend rules when necessary
  • may be regarded by others as impulsive.

 

You have indicated that you are highly disciplined in both your behavior and your ability to pay attention, to stay on task when necessary. Your ability to control your behavior, to not give in to your impulses very often, is probably crucial to your performance.

In general, people successful in business are disciplined. There is one major concern with such a tendency. Sometimes people like you who are so good at sticking to their knitting, at following through on what they promise, keeping appointments, etc. find it difficult to understand others who are not so well- behaved. True, these people do have more fun at times, but do they have to be so irresponsible? You may not say these things outloud, but you may show (in subtle ways) your disapproval. Even if they deserve censure, your relationship may suffer. Perhaps worst of all, many others may consider you as too well-behaved. They may even call you "stodgy."

* You are advised to take a deep breath whenever someone irritates you by not playing by the rules (your rules?). Is this behavior just a harmless affectation or is a serious breech of policy or decorum? Make sure that you can distinguish between these with a clear head before you take action.

* Team building. Believe it or not there are times when your well-behaved approach is not going to work. At times, the situation calls for someone who does not let rules or policy stop them from doing what needs to be done. Learn to identify these people and discern those rare times when they should "pull the trigger" because you will hesitate too long. Let's face it, don't you find yourself cringing at some of the questions investigative reporters ask.

 
Drive and Confidence 

 
DRIVE AND CONFIDENCE

The twin towers of dominance are the desire to have control over what happens and the self-confidence to believe one's approach is the right way.  These two characteristics are like fire.  Fire, properly controlled, fueled progress in early civilizations.  Out of control, fire destroys.  The drive to succeed and take a leadership role accompanies many -- but not all -- leaders.  Similar levels of drive are also found among many people with behavioral problems, even some with criminal records.  So much of the direction in which this drive takes one depends on who is the master of the power and how it is applied. 

CONTROL (of others)

Indicates how much individuals like to control others and actually take charge or assumes a leadership position. 

SELF-CONFIDENCE

Measures the extent to which people think they are competent at doing things and how good a person they think they are. 

SELF-CRITICAL

Reflects how critical people are of themselves.  Very high scores tend to accompany depression.  This scale often reflects temporary problems in the personal or professional lives of participants, and it subtracts from the self-esteem which they are feeling at the time of assessment. 


 
Control
Low scorers:
  • prefer to take a laissez-faire, 'hands off' approach to managing others
  • accept leadership roles with reluctance
  • may be uncomfortable if put in charge.
High scorers:
  • want to be in charge
  • actively seek leadership roles
  • May be uncomfortable when not leading.
 

 
Self-Confidence
Low scorers:
  • lack confidence
  • doubt their abilities
  • do not recover quickly from mistakes.
High scorers:
  • are confident
  • believe they are very competent
  • recover quickly from mistakes.

 
Self-Critical
Low scorers:
  • may not often reflect on their actions or their consequences
  • appear confident in their abilities.
High scorers:
  • may be reflecting on temporary problems they were experiencing when they filled in the forms
  • may have a tendency to be too hard on themselves.

You have a tremendous drive to be in control or come out on top of challenging situations. You feel you have to excel at everything which matters to you. Anything but ultimate success eats at you until you can correct the situation. After experiencing some frustration about less-than-stellar performance, you bounce back, eager to try again and sure you will do better the next time. You have the killer instinct. Such a fire within often accompanies success.

The drive you have poses potential problems between you and those you lead or work with. Whether yours gets in the way of relationships with others is influenced by other TAIS inventory dimensions such as whether you are relatively more supportive than critical and whether you are impulsive and/or easily distracted.

Issues of control and delegation make or break most organizations and their leaders. No one can do everything. Leaders need to balance doing it themselves and delegation. Most driven people have to guard against trying to do everything themselves. "If you want something done right, do it yourself," is their motto, spoken aloud or not. Lack of delegation becomes a major problem when there is the need to develop strong members of the team.

* Team Building. Wise and effective leaders balance doing it themselves with delegation.

* Delegation requires precise communication. Be clear about what responsibilities and authority the person to whom you are delegating has.

A central issue in organizations is the battle over who will be in charge. When two or more strong-willed people come together there is always the chance of an authority conflict occurring.

* You need to be alert for your frustration or displays of temper which arise when you do not get your way. Develop ways to step back a moment and center yourself before getting into fights for control.

* Trust in the ability of others and a sense of humor about your needs and imperfections are crucial to defusing authority impasses.

* You need to learn to curb your impatience when working with new people or facing uncontrollable delays.

* Team Building. In order for you to work successfully with others of equal drive and confidence, the following conditions have to be met:

* There needs to be a mutual respect for the abilities of each other.

* You have to trust each other.

* You need to "divide up the turf." Specify who is responsible for which tasks.

* Team Building. If key people around you don't share your drive to succeed, you may find yourselves drifting apart. Especially if you also are quite narrowly focused in your attention, disciplined and not easily distracted, your coworkers and/or spouse may see you as completely insensitive to their needs or to any other way of doing things.

* Seek mutual interests to keep you from drifting apart. Strange as it may sound to you, not all of life's important events are measured by "keeping score." There are many activities which are rewarding just for the doing of them. You don't have to worry about losing your competitiveness when you really need it by immersing yourself fully in intrinsically-interesting activities.

Listening skills are key to your long-term success. One way in which people like you show their arrogance is by tuning out others’ point of view even while they are still speaking. You may think you are still listening, but sensitive observers can tell when you have gone inside your head to play with your own, more-valuable (to you), ideas.

* It is extremely important that you develop active listening techniques so that others feel that you have heard them. Learn to paraphrase what the other person said and check to see if you are correct. You must withhold judgment while you do this.

Finally, arrogance has a way of leaking out. For some like you, it happens frequently. Some with your level of confidence are so nice and in need of approval that they typically keep their negative opinions of others’ skills to themselves— most of the time. If pushed enough, truly confident people will let it be known that they don’t consider some others worthy of being in their league on the skills which define their competence.

* Learn to laugh at yourself. Become keenly aware of your own limitations. Can you say the three things Mark McCormack says are the hardest things to say? "I don’t know." "I need help." "I was wrong." Judicious and congruent use of these three phrases can take the sting out of your confidence. People will admire and trust you rather than secretly hoping for your downfall.

 
Ways of Dominating and Competing 

Entire books could be written about the way control needs and self-confidence play out in personal and professional relations.  Many variables affect their use including anger vs. support, impulse control, and attentional preferences and distractibility (see other sections of your report for your tendencies on these variables).  Foremost allies for control and confidence are the characteristics of physical orientation or competitiveness and expression of ideas.  They are both included here because a) some people have not had the chance to compete physically, and b) dominance in business is more often intellectual than physical.

PHYSICALLY COMPETITIVE people try to dominate in physical ways and are prone to keep score as they have in athletic contests even in other arenas whether appropriate or not.  They like challenges.

INTELLECTUALLY COMPETITIVE (or expression of ideas) scale indicates how likely people are to express what is on their minds.  By talking a great deal, many leaders dominate the thoughts and actions of others. 


Physically Competitive
Low scorers:
  • shy away from physical challenges
  • are not driven by easily measured results.
High scorers:
  • 'keep score' as if in active competition
  • seek to dominate others physically, for example through body language.

Intellectually Competitive
Low scorers:
  • tend to keep their thoughts to themselves
  • tend to avoid arguments.
High scorers:
  • tend to try to dominate conversations, and influence the thoughts and actions of others.

You are driven to dominate the scene whether it be with physical skill or through expression of your clever ideas. In particular, you have indicated that you are more expressive of your thoughts and ideas than 85 percent of the general population and more physically competitive than 65 to 85 percent of people. The chances are high that you dominate most settings with one or both styles of competitiveness.

It seems that your competitiveness is more evidence of your drive to succeed. These two variables add fuel to your "fire within." The question which arises is, "Who owns the fire?" You have the style of many high-level executives and entrepreneurs. You also have something in common with many people who get in trouble in some way with authority, either at work or with the law.

Often there is a fine line between tremendous success and major catastrophes for people with your style. Check again to see if your need for control and self esteem are high, which we suspect. If so, it is important that you not have some tendencies which can let this tremendous drive of yours get out of hand. Are you an angry, critical person? Check to see your level of expression of anger and criticism in the last section of this report. If so, do you have at least as great a tendency to express your support and affection to tone down your tendency to get argumentative or confrontive when you don’t get your way?

Are you highly impulsive? If so, you are likely to have a hair-trigger temper when someone crosses you or doesn’t agree with you. This tendency is even worse if you are easily distracted (see your external and internal distractibility scores).

If you have any of the above tendencies, the advice for dealing with a high drive given in the prior section is even more needed.

You have simply got to learn the following:

* It is not a good idea in the long run to orient completely around dominating others, whether it is through better, quicker arguments or physically.

* You will not develop strong associates if you win at everything from golf, to who has the best car, to conversations.

You really need to mellow out, i.e., learn to relax a bit (take a centering deep breath) and let go once in a while. You will not lose your drive by becoming a bit more selective with it. We have seen fathers literally going all out to beat their five-year-old children in Monopoly or miniature golf. Lighten up.

Find out if people really respect you or just fear your quick tongue.


 

 
Decision Making Style 

DECISION MAKING STYLE

This scale provides an indication of the individual's speed of decision making.  High scorers make slower decisions, tending to sacrifice speed for the sake of accuracy.  People who are cautious often worry about matters.  Low scorers make quick decisions and are more likely to err because they end up sacrificing some accuracy for the sake of speed.  They tend to become impatient with delays. 


Decision Making Style
Low scorers:
  • make fast decisions
  • willing to sacrifice some accuracy for speed
  • likely to become impatient about delays.
High scorers:
  • make decisions more slowly
  • value accuracy over speed
  • may have trouble with fast-moving situations.

You tend to make decisions more quickly than the average person and about as quickly as most business leaders and top sales people do. You seem to handle pressure about the same as these people do. You will be frustrated by bosses, coworkers, or subordinates who are more cautious than you, who drag matters out and make you wait.

* Pause a moment when you start to make others feel rushed to move or commit before they are ready. Paradoxically, you will get more out of them (on time) if you don't pressure them.

* It is important that you find ways to bring into the open your need and apparent ability to make decisions fairly quickly. Because some of your rapid decisions will undoubtedly be in error occasionally (at least in others' eyes), it is really helpful if they hear your thought processes used in reaching your conclusion. When they cannot "see" how you made your decision, your "critics" are free to presume you were impulsive instead of decisive.

* Team Building. Sometimes people who work or live together learn to laugh with each other at their idiosyncrasies in moments of stress. Laughter relaxes people, defusing enough of the pressure so that impatient people can wait more patiently and cautious individuals can move on, take action somewhat more rapidly.

Because you are relatively low on anxiety, you spend less time than average caught up in your head worrying about problems. This enables you to switch your focus of attention fairly quickly to what is going on around you even when you have been thinking. You still make concentration errors, but you apparently make fewer pressure-induced mistakes than most people do.

 
Orientation towards Others

 
EXTROVERSION

Measures the extent to which people seek out and enjoy the company of others. High scorers are quite outgoing, like to be the center of attention. Individuals in sales and service occupations tend to score higher on this scale than people who are involved in more technical activities. Low scorers tend to be shy. 

INTROVERSION

Measures your need for personal space and privacy. High scorers indicate an enjoyment of time alone. Low scorers generally become stressed when they have to be alone for any length of time. Because each of these scales is defined in a positive manner, some people legitimately score high or moderately high on both of them. Such people are saying that they like being with other people, AND they like being by themselves. 


 

Extroversion
Low scorers:
  • do not have a strong need to be around others.
High scorers::
  • are very outgoing
  • may like to be the center of attention.

 
Introversion
Low scorers:
  • do not have a strong desire for personal space and privacy .
High scorers::
  • enjoy time alone
  • want personal space and privacy.
 

You score higher than 70 to 95% of people on the scale which indicates your need for involvement with others. You are comfortable being the center of attention and probably (but not necessarily) provide a great deal of positive support for others (check the expression of support scale in the next section). You meet people well, establish rapport fairly quickly. Typically, extroverts are happy in their major relationships. Chances are you are good at playing peace maker, willing to compromise in order to smooth over "troubled waters."

To emphasize your gregarious side, your need for time alone is quite low (below the 15th percentile). To be sure, you occasionally seek solace away from people, but you do this far less often than most people. Problems may also arise for you because you have difficulty saying "no" to others, setting limits on your involvement and commitment. You probably are not willing to risk isolation.

* Your definite preference for social interaction can lead to a time management problem for you. Learn to build in restraints to your taking too many "people breaks" while doing some task which requires working by yourself for an extended period of time. You might consider telling all the people you most enjoy socializing with that you are busy and that the closed door is really your signal for help. In other words, "please stay away because I am trying to finish that report which is due tomorrow morning." It really is a compliment to tell others that you find talking to them too irresistible.

* If you also don't like to argue or confront people, you will need to develop some protective patterns to avoid committing yourself to too many things. Some people learn to say that they will have to check with their boss, secretary, or spouse before agreeing to any new request. This gives you time to prepare a nice way to say no to extra involvements.

* Find a good model, someone who maintains cordial relationships yet is able to set limits on others. Imitate how this person s/he says no, firmly but nicely.

* Team Building. You can have problems with significant others who both desire plenty of involvement with you and yet also have a need for privacy. Given your pattern of scores it is unlikely that you will ever really understand their need to be alone especially because it conflicts with your need to socialize and be mutually supportive.

You probably also tend to hog the spotlight perhaps even without knowing it. This can be intimidating to those who want to take center stage at times but do not want to fight you for it, or, more appropriately, try to upstage you, the master of this.

* Some open communication is really crucial in such situations.


 
Communication Style 

 
EXPRESSION OF IDEAS

Measures your willingness to speak up in front of others. High scorers like to express their thoughts and ideas. The higher you score the more likely you are to talk too much. Low scorers find themselves feeling stressed by situations that require them to speak up in front of others. They tend to underestimate the value of their input. 

EXPRESSION OF CRITICISM AND ANGER

Measures your willingness to confront others, to set limits, and to express your anger. The higher you score the more challenging and confronting you are. The lower you score the more difficulty you have setting limits and saying no. Thus, others are likely to take advantage of you. 

EXPRESSION OF SUPPORT AND AFFECTION

Measures your willingness to express positive feelings and support to others. The higher you score the more often you reach out in a positive, supportive way and the more you need to receive such in return. Being positive helps in positions with considerable contact with people and when participating in team efforts. 

 

Expression of Ideas
Low scorers:
  • feel stressed when they have to present their ideas to others
  • tend to underestimate the value of their ideas
  • may not speak up even if they have something valuable to contribute.
High scorers::
  • are comfortable expressing thoughts and ideas
  • may risk talking too much.

 
Expression of Criticism & Anger
Low scorers:
  • find it difficult to set limits, or say no
  • are uncomfortable with confrontation and conflict.
High scorers::
  • are more likely to confront or challenge others
  • may be too critical.

Expression of Support & Affection
Low scorers:
  • have little need to receive or give support
  • work well in environments that do not provide positive reinforcement.
High scorers::
  • are supportive to those around them
  • have an optimistic and positive perspective on the world
  • are most comfortable in a positive environment.

You like to talk, and you are quite friendly and supportive to people around you. You are much more expressive of your thoughts and your affection than most people. You are confident that what you have to say is well received by others. Even though you frequently talk too much, most people like what they hear because it is positive, even complimentary.

You are extremely open about almost everything except what is irritating you. To get a visual image of the imbalance in your three forms of expression, take a good look at the graphs above. They show you are above the 84th percentile on expression of ideas and expression of support and below the 30th percentile on expression of anger and criticism.

If you are high on control and competitive needs, it may be a good thing that you cover up your intense drive with charm and support. Up to a point.

People who seem gregarious and expressive but keep certain things to themselves (like their anger and criticism) are likely to confuse others especially if they are dominant or controlling otherwise. You seem uncomfortable with sharing your anger in a straightforward manner. You may dominate conversations, even intimidate people by your quick wit and your ability to get your way by persuading others, but you rarely express what is bothering you cleanly and in a timely manner. You are quite adept at covering up your concerns with something positive or reasons why you feel the way you do (rationalizing).

* You need to learn to listen, to take a deep breath and allow input from others. You must find a way to be active in your listening (paraphrase what the other person said, say things like "uh-huh") to keep your attention on what the others are saying without drifting off into your own thoughts.

* You can be well liked and express what irritates you. Even though you are generally confident, part of you seems worried that if you express your anger others may not like you, get into an argument or worse yet, criticize you in return. Leader (Parent, Teacher) Effectiveness Training teaches people how to express "I- confrontive" messages. They consist of saying how you feel genuinely to a certain behavior (not the person him or herself). If you are careful to respond to the behavior with your real feelings, you can keep relations on a positive note as well as have your needs met. You generally need to shift into listening gear after expressing your concerns (see the first recommendation).

* Remember that you do get angry, everyone does. Often your rare outbursts hurt others more because they are so infrequent. This is all the more reason for learning to express "I-confrontive" messages cleanly instead of bottling things up inside until you burst. People like you often are not good at expressing anger genuinely because you do not practice it often.

* Team Building. You obviously have only one gap in terms of your expressiveness. Thus, you need a teammate who can help you express what is wrong with a proposal in no uncertain terms when you are tempted to cover up your displeasure with a lot of words and charm. Think back on occasions when (for all your confidence) you let some problem go unattended. Wouldn't you love to replay that scene with a more hard-nosed partner? Arrange it now so you will be prepared for the next time.

 
Conclusions & Recommendations

No psychological test or performance measurement is perfect.  There may be one or more hypotheses in your TAIS Performance Report that you do not agree with or view as inaccurate.  Here is how EPS recommends you deal with those:

The purpose of the TAIS is to target your performance strengths and weaknesses.  This assessment is the first step in improving your ability to perform effectively under pressure.  The best way to make use of the information contained in your TAIS Performance Report is to:
  1. Thoroughly catalogue your strengths and try to put yourself in performance environments that play to those strengths
  2. Understand and seek to be aware of your vulnerabilities under pressure and endeavor to keep those vulnerabilities from interfering with performance
  3. Select 2 or 3 of the vulnerabilities listed in your TAIS Performance Report as targets for your performance enhancement program
  4. Use the recommendations contained in the Report in addition to other performance enhancement products available from EPS
Keep in mind that any performance enhancement program requires commitment, dedication, and time.  Meaningful changes do not happen overnight.  World-Class performers focus their energies on improving performance by eliminating mistakes in high pressure situations.  The TAIS Performance Report gives you the information you need to take your performance to the next level.

Good Luck

Index:
1. Introduction
2. TAIS Scale Profile
3. Attentional Styles
4. Preference for Diverse Activities
5. Orientation towards Rules & Risk
6. Drive and Confidence
7. Ways of Dominating and Competing
8. Decision Making Style
9. Orientation towards Others
10. Communication Style
11. Conclusions & Recommendations
12. Recommended Printing Options
13. How to Save This Document
 

Copyright © 1974–2026 by Grandlark Investments, Inc.
Used under exclusive license to TAIS Performance Systems, Inc.
699 Cardero Street, Suite 502, Vancouver, BC V6G 3H7 Canada
All rights reserved.

 
Recommended Printing Options

 

For the best print of this document we recommend that your print margins be set to 1" and that you print the background.  To print the background follow these simple instructions for your particular browser:

Netscape:

  1. Select "File" and then "Page Setup" from the menu at the top of the screen.
  2. If the box next to the option "Print backgrounds" does not contain a check mark, click on the box.
  3. Click "OK".
Microsoft Internet Explorer:
  1. Select "View" and then "Internet Options" from the menu at the top of the screen.
  2. Click on the tab labeled, "Advanced."
  3. Scroll about 2/3rds down until you see "Print background colors and images"
  4. If the box next to this option does not contain a check mark, click on the box.
  5. Click "OK".

 
 
 
How to Save This Document

When saving a web page to your computer most browsers will not save the images with the page.  Therefore, we recommend that you bookmark this page for future reference.  To do this follow these simple instructions for your particular browser:

Netscape:

    Select "Bookmark" and then "Add Bookmark" from the menu at the top of the screen.
Microsoft Internet Explorer:
  1. Select "Favorites" and then "Add to Favorites" from the menu at the top of the screen.
  2. For the question, "Would you also like to subscribe to this page?", respond by clicking the option, "No, just add the page to my favorites."
  3. Click "OK".